It is the "interface-automatic: yes" statement. It overrides the other
interface statements and listens on port 53. If you remove that I think
you have a better shot at making it work.
It is the "interface-automatic: yes" statement. It overrides the other
interface statements and listens on port 53. If you remove that I think
you have a better shot at making it work.
I've had the same issue and got luck with interface-automatic. But I
would not have guessed from the manpage that listening-on-something and
interface-automatic is related in any way.
interface-automatic: <yes or no>
Detect source interface on UDP queries and copy them to replies.
This feature is experimental, and needs support in your OS for
particular socket options. Default value is no
It is the "interface-automatic: yes" statement. It overrides the other
interface statements and listens on port 53. If you remove that I think
you have a better shot at making it work.
Yes, that makes it work. Thanks alot.
I've had the same issue and got luck with interface-automatic. But I
would not have guessed from the manpage that listening-on-something and
interface-automatic is related in any way.
interface-automatic: <yes or no>
Detect source interface on UDP queries and copy them to replies.
This feature is experimental, and needs support in your OS for
particular socket options. Default value is no
Same here, I'd appreciate an addendum to the man page entry that clarifies the
behaviour.
I think I enabled interface-automatic ~2 years back when I saw Unbound reply with
the wrong source address to queries, thereby breaking client lookups.
If that happens again, you'll hear back from me. Thanks so far!